Mi Mundo en Palabras en Letras Creativas

Third Chapter

The Global Market and the New Economic Model

It is interesting to analyze the management of money today in the face of globalization processes and new and innovative companies called startups.

These innovations for and in business seek to provide distinctive solutions to existing or emerging problems, providing a change of attitude in the various sectors of the world economy.

This may include the development of new products, services or business models that fit the changing needs of consumers and market trends. In addition, these entities often use advanced technologies and creative approaches to conceive these solutions, which allows them to distinguish themselves from the competition and generate a positive impact on society.

By focusing on problem-solving, startups not only create economic opportunities but also contribute to general well-being by addressing relevant and urgent challenges.

But it is good to go step by step and ask ourselves first of all how modern political philosophy has given way to the whole framework that we now live in and that many scholars try to define without removing the suits that have once been used to specify activities and processes in the economy of the countries of the world.

Modern political philosophy developed at a crucial moment in European history, during the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. It was in this period of change and discovery that philosophers began to question existing power structures and propose new forms of government based on reason and individual freedom. This renewed interest in critical thinking led to an emergence of ideas that challenged monarchical authority, at that time, and the promotion of natural rights, which laid the groundwork for future democratic movements. Furthermore, the rise of science and rationalism allowed thinkers of the time to explore the relationship between the individual and the state, advocating the separation of powers and the importance of citizen participation. Such concepts became fundamental pillars that will continue to influence the political theory and practice of modern democracies, thus allowing for a dialogue that continues to be valid today.*

In practical terms, universities and books have already taught us and pointed out the main authors of these processes, but what is left for us after all this has shaped us in a specific way and not another?

Individuals and states are those who face realities that obey the places on the planet where they have to live, the rules are adjusted to the needs guided by the politics of their region. Not everyone is happy with the circumstances they live in and they depend on the multi and bilateral relationships they have sustained for things to happen or be hindered.

There appears an actor who creates a different scheme which many call a right of popular sovereignty supported by economic sustainability that is based on the use of different strategies to use, safeguard and maintain human and material resources in an optimal way, with the objective of creating a responsible and beneficial balance, sustainable in the long term, through recovery and recycling.

This practice not only involves the conservation of resources but also innovation in processes that promote more efficient production, reducing waste and promoting the reuse of materials. In addition, it is crucial to involve all interested parties, from companies to individuals, in the search for a development that prioritizes social and environmental well-being, thus ensuring that future generations can enjoy a healthy environment and sufficient resources to satisfy their essential needs.

From my point of view, this action is the friendliest we can find in terms of how to use what serves us, sustain life and the exchange of services. However, alongside this activity, there is the activity that creates needs that we did not have, that invents them, motivating the consumption of materials that create more waste and that are useful because of their practicality.

In the aspect of social inclusion, it is supposed to promote equality of opportunity, but the scheme is corrupted when goods and services assume a class status and then people look at what they assume they need simply because it gives them status.

In this sense, the resilient value of basic products is diverted towards the diversity of options where the cost of each is measured by the ability of the subjects to acquire them.

When talking about intergenerational equity, in the search for new generations to be able to acquire what others have, there is a gap, since the consumer culture will offer them more materials to recycle and a diversity of products that operate with limited update date in search of benefiting the productive machinery.

El Auge de la Filosofía Política en la Era Moderna